VIJAYA MAROTIRAO GOLLAR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/2456/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030260402025

e-Filing Number

24-04-2025

Filing Number

APPLN/6619/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

APPLN/2456/2025

Registration Date

04-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498-A,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYA MAROTIRAO GOLLAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. Barlota Ambar S.

  2. 2.SUHASINI YOGESH CHAUDHARI

  3. 3.YOGESH PRAKASH CHAUDHARI

  4. 4.NANDINI AMOL KUSALE

  5. 5.AMOL BHAGWANRAO KUSALE

  6. 6.SUSHILA NAGAPPA KOHIRKAR

  7. 7.SAIKRANTI ALIAS SONALI RAMCHANDRA ARETI

  8. 8.LALITA RAMCHANDRA ARETI

  9. 9.VINODINI VITTHAL ARETI

  10. 10.SAISHRUTHI RAMCHANDRA ARETI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.RAJSHREE RAKESH GOLHAR

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted permission to the applicants to amend their petition to challenge the charge-sheet filed during the pendency of the application, with amendments to be completed within two weeks. The case was adjourned for three weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/2456/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted permission to the applicants to amend their petition to challenge the charge-sheet filed during the pendency of the application, with amendments to be completed within two weeks. The case was adjourned for three weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case