SAGAR SUBHASH HATTE vs THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS — WP/8602/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 21 AND 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030260202025

Filing Number

WP/19400/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

WP/8602/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 21 AND 226
Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act 1956

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAGAR SUBHASH HATTE

    Adv. GADHE GANESH ASARAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

    Adv. GORE NIKITA NARAYAN FOR R/1,AGP for R. No. 2.,BORULKAR AVINASH R. FOR R. NO. 1,NITIN TRIMBAK TRIBHUWAN FOR R. NO. 1,R. Nos. 3 to 8 are Served. 1123

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

  3. 3.THE MANAGER VAISHYA NAGARI SAHAKARI BANK LTD PARBHANI

  4. 4.THE MANAGER MAHARASHTRA GRAMIN BANK BRANCH LATUR

  5. 5.SUBHASH RACHAPPA HATTE

  6. 6.GIRJABAI SUBHASH HATTE

  7. 7.SANJAY SUBHASH HATTE

  8. 8.JYOTI MANOJ PATIL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/8602/2025 - Sagar Subhash Hatte v. Union of India The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed that private Neuro Physician Dr. Devashish Ruikar be included in the Medical Board to examine the petitioner's father within 8 days, after the government medical college reported its Neuro Physician position was vacant. The court granted this modification due to the petitioner's father's medical condition making transfer to another hospital impractical. A copy of the medical report shall be provided to the petitioner, with liberty to circulate the matter during court vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  15. 17-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8602/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/8602/2025 - Sagar Subhash Hatte v. Union of India The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed that private Neuro Physician Dr. Devashish Ruikar be included in the Medical Board to examine the petitioner's father within 8 days, after the government medical college reported its Neuro Physician position was vacant. The court granted this modification due to the petitioner's father's medical condition making transfer to another hospital impractical. A copy of the medical report shall be provided to the petitioner, with liberty to circulate the matter during court vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case