DR BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MAGASWARGIYA AOUDYOGIK UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANSTHA THU ITS CHAIRMAN R S SAWANT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/8062/2017
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030250312017
Next Hearing
21st June 2017
Filing Number
WP/20639/2017
Filing Date
20-06-2017
Registration No
WP/8062/2017
Registration Date
20-06-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DR BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MAGASWARGIYA AOUDYOGIK UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANSTHA THU ITS CHAIRMAN R S SAWANT
Adv. CHAVAN SUDHIR K
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. GP FOR R/ 1 TO 4 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2020 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 21-07-2017 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 21-06-2017 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on 6th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous, and the court accepted this submission and accordingly disposed of the case without adjudicating on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on 6th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous, and the court accepted this submission and accordingly disposed of the case without adjudicating on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts