DR BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MAGASWARGIYA AOUDYOGIK UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANSTHA THU ITS CHAIRMAN R S SAWANT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/8062/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Jun-2017

CNR: HCBM030250312017

Filing Number

WP/20639/2017

Filing Date

20-Jun-2017

Registration No

WP/8062/2017

Registration Date

20-Jun-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Mah.co-operative Society Act 1960

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MAGASWARGIYA AOUDYOGIK UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANSTHA THU ITS CHAIRMAN R S SAWANT

    Adv. CHAVAN SUDHIR K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. GP FOR R/ 1 TO 4 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on 6th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous, and the court accepted this submission and accordingly disposed of the case without adjudicating on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2020

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    According To Sitting List

  4. 21-Jul-2017

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh

  5. 21-Jun-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. DeshmukhView PDF

  6. 21-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8062/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on 6th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous, and the court accepted this submission and accordingly disposed of the case without adjudicating on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case