National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH vs Kaminibai Ramesh Dutte And Anothers — CA/9150/2025
Case under Arbitration Act 1940 Section 37. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030246582025
e-Filing Number
08-02-2025
Filing Number
CA/18416/2025
Filing Date
21-06-2025
Registration No
CA/9150/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH
Respondent(s)
Kaminibai Ramesh Dutte And Anothers
Adv. ,BHOSALE RAMDAS B.,Kale Ajeet B.,ADV. AJIT B. KALE FOR R/1 (VP FILED) 1123
The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer At Bhusawal
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Revoked
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Revoked |
| 11-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE |
| 29-09-2025 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging compensation awards for land acquired for NH-6 widening in Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's award of ₹2,600 per sq. meter for lands in village Ghodasgaon, finding that sufficient deductions (20% for distance, 15% for size) were appropriately made compared to comparable acquisitions in nearby villages, and that the compensation reasonably reflected the land's market value and National Ambition potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging compensation awards for land acquired for NH-6 widening in Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's award of ₹2,600 per sq. meter for lands in village Ghodasgaon, finding that sufficient deductions (20% for distance, 15% for size) were appropriately made compared to comparable acquisitions in nearby villages, and that the compensation reasonably reflected the land's market value and National Ambition potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts