National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH vs Sanjay Narayan Patil And Another — CA/9140/2025
Case under Arbitration Act 1940 Section 37. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030246322025
e-Filing Number
08-02-2025
Filing Number
CA/18393/2025
Filing Date
21-06-2025
Registration No
CA/9140/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Narayan Patil And Another
Adv. ,BHOSALE RAMDAS B. 1123
The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer At Bhusawal
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Revoked
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Revoked |
| 10-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE |
| 29-09-2025 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging land compensation awards for NH-6 widening in Jalgaon district. The court upheld arbitrators' awards of ₹2,600 per sq. meter (with 20% distance deduction and 15% size deduction from base ₹4,000), finding the compensation reasonable and following its earlier precedent in a related matter involving similar acquisition parameters and location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging land compensation awards for NH-6 widening in Jalgaon district. The court upheld arbitrators' awards of ₹2,600 per sq. meter (with 20% distance deduction and 15% size deduction from base ₹4,000), finding the compensation reasonable and following its earlier precedent in a related matter involving similar acquisition parameters and location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts