National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH vs Shankar Ganpat Ingale And Other — ARBA/80/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030245142025
e-Filing Number
06-02-2025
Filing Number
ARBA/18292/2025
Filing Date
21-Jun-2025
Registration No
ARBA/80/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shankar Ganpat Ingale And Other
-
2.The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer At Bhusawal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India challenging land compensation awards for NH-6 expansion in Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's awards of Rs. 2,600 per sq. meter, finding the deductions for distance (20%) and land size (15%) reasonable, and relying on its earlier precedent establishing that post-notification sale deeds can be considered when determining fair market value if conditions are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
21-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. ARBA/80/2026
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India challenging land compensation awards for NH-6 expansion in Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's awards of Rs. 2,600 per sq. meter, finding the deductions for distance (20%) and land size (15%) reasonable, and relying on its earlier precedent establishing that post-notification sale deeds can be considered when determining fair market value if conditions are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts