National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon vs Tukaram Shankar Aage — ARBA/77/2026

Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030245072025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

06-02-2025

Filing Number

ARBA/18285/2025

Filing Date

20-06-2025

Registration No

ARBA/77/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

National Highways Authority of India PIU Jalgaon

Adv. Manorkar Deepak S

Respondent(s)

Tukaram Shankar Aage

The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer At Bhusawal

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

09-04-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

09-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging land compensation awards for properties acquired for NH-6 widening near Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's compensation of ₹2,600 per sq. meter, finding that adequate deductions were made for distance and land size, and that the arbitrator properly considered post-notification sale evidence and national highway development potential in determining fair market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging land compensation awards for properties acquired for NH-6 widening near Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's compensation of ₹2,600 per sq. meter, finding that adequate deductions were made for distance and land size, and that the arbitrator properly considered post-notification sale evidence and national highway development potential in determining fair market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case