KURESHI TOFIK SATTAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/4107/2018
Case under Mah.mun.coun.nagar Pan.& Ind.tow.act 65. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030244232017
Next Hearing
26th March 2020
Filing Number
WP/20189/2017
Filing Date
16-06-2017
Registration No
WP/4107/2018
Registration Date
21-04-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KURESHI TOFIK SATTAR
Adv. UNDRE VIKRAM SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2020 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary of WP/4107/2018 (Kureshi Tofik Sattar v. The State of Maharashtra) The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the petitioner's tenure had already ended in 2018, rendering the petition moot. The court declined to adjudicate the substantive issues since no relief could be granted given the expired tenure period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/4107/2018 (Kureshi Tofik Sattar v. The State of Maharashtra) The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the petitioner's tenure had already ended in 2018, rendering the petition moot. The court declined to adjudicate the substantive issues since no relief could be granted given the expired tenure period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts