EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. vs THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS — CA/9699/2012

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Jul-2014

CNR: HCBM030243772012

Filing Number

CA/19715/2012

Filing Date

26-Jul-2012

Registration No

CA/9699/2012

Registration Date

27-Aug-2012

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION DIV.

    Adv. SURVASE B.R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the Executive Engineer's appeal challenging land acquisition compensation and partly allowed the claimants' cross-objection. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.14,000 per are (awarded by Reference Court) to Rs.60 per sq. ft., applying parity with similar Division Bench judgments involving identical land acquisition purpose and location, finding the Reference Court failed to properly justify rejecting the sale exemplar evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  4. 26-Jun-2020

    For Orders (Civil)

    According To Sitting List

  5. 10-Oct-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  6. 04-Jul-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Jul-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/9699/2012

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the Executive Engineer's appeal challenging land acquisition compensation and partly allowed the claimants' cross-objection. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.14,000 per are (awarded by Reference Court) to Rs.60 per sq. ft., applying parity with similar Division Bench judgments involving identical land acquisition purpose and location, finding the Reference Court failed to properly justify rejecting the sale exemplar evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case