BAJIRAO CHIMAJI WAFARE vs SADASHIV NARAYAN LONKAR AND OTHERS — WP/9041/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030241362021

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/19220/2021

Filing Date

28-07-2021

Registration No

WP/9041/2021

Registration Date

17-08-2021

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

BAJIRAO CHIMAJI WAFARE

Adv. Dhorde Vikram R

Respondent(s)

SADASHIV NARAYAN LONKAR AND OTHERS

Adv. AGP FOR R. NO. 3 AND 4,R. Nos. 1 and 2 are served.,KANAWADE AJAY T. AND BHOSALE K.N. FOR R/1 AND 2,KALE PRATIKSHA CHHABURAO FOR R.NO. 2 1123

SHEETAL SANTOSH LONKAR

THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

THE TAHSILDAR PARNER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

21-08-2021

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

04-05-2026

PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

27-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

21-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

06-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Case Summary: WP/9041/2021 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed petitioner Bajirao Chimaji Wafare's writ petition, quashing the Sub-Divisional Officer's order of June 2, 2021, which had partly allowed respondents' application claiming right of way through petitioner's land. The court found no evidence of a customary pathway reaching the respondents' fields and determined the Sub-Divisional Officer erred by recording that respondents were absent during the panchanama inspection when the panchanama records clearly showed their presence. The court directed respondents to pursue relief under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 if access issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/9041/2021 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed petitioner Bajirao Chimaji Wafare's writ petition, quashing the Sub-Divisional Officer's order of June 2, 2021, which had partly allowed respondents' application claiming right of way through petitioner's land. The court found no evidence of a customary pathway reaching the respondents' fields and determined the Sub-Divisional Officer erred by recording that respondents were absent during the panchanama inspection when the panchanama records clearly showed their presence. The court directed respondents to pursue relief under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 if access issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case