BAJIRAO CHIMAJI WAFARE vs SADASHIV NARAYAN LONKAR AND OTHERS — WP/9041/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030241362021

Filing Number

WP/19220/2021

Filing Date

28-Jul-2021

Registration No

WP/9041/2021

Registration Date

17-Aug-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJIRAO CHIMAJI WAFARE

    Adv. Dhorde Vikram R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SADASHIV NARAYAN LONKAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. AGP FOR R. NO. 3 AND 4,R. Nos. 1 and 2 are served.,KANAWADE AJAY T. AND BHOSALE K.N. FOR R/1 AND 2,KALE PRATIKSHA CHHABURAO FOR R.NO. 2 1123

  2. 2.SHEETAL SANTOSH LONKAR

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  4. 4.THE TAHSILDAR PARNER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/9041/2021 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed petitioner Bajirao Chimaji Wafare's writ petition, quashing the Sub-Divisional Officer's order of June 2, 2021, which had partly allowed respondents' application claiming right of way through petitioner's land. The court found no evidence of a customary pathway reaching the respondents' fields and determined the Sub-Divisional Officer erred by recording that respondents were absent during the panchanama inspection when the panchanama records clearly showed their presence. The court directed respondents to pursue relief under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 if access issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Part Heard - CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

  10. 06-Mar-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  12. 12-Jan-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  13. 03-Dec-2021

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  14. 14-Oct-2021

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  15. 30-Sep-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. SuryawanshiView PDF

  16. 30-Sep-2021

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  17. 21-Aug-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. PatilView PDF

  18. 21-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 28-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9041/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/9041/2021 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed petitioner Bajirao Chimaji Wafare's writ petition, quashing the Sub-Divisional Officer's order of June 2, 2021, which had partly allowed respondents' application claiming right of way through petitioner's land. The court found no evidence of a customary pathway reaching the respondents' fields and determined the Sub-Divisional Officer erred by recording that respondents were absent during the panchanama inspection when the panchanama records clearly showed their presence. The court directed respondents to pursue relief under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 if access issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case