ARUN DILIPRAO DASARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/503/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030238462018
Filing Number
CP/18716/2018
Filing Date
03-Jul-2018
Registration No
CP/503/2018
Registration Date
11-Jul-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN DILIPRAO DASARE
Adv. ANIL PRAKASHRAO PIRATWAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the continuation petition filed by Arun Diliprao Dasare on 04.05.2026. The court noted that the petitioner's tribe claim had been directed for decision in 2018, and the petitioner's subsequent absence indicated compliance with that order, rendering the petition moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
30-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
30-Aug-2018
Urgent Orders (Civil)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
27-Jul-2018
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale
-
13-Jul-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. DhavaleView PDF
-
13-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CP/503/2018
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the continuation petition filed by Arun Diliprao Dasare on 04.05.2026. The court noted that the petitioner's tribe claim had been directed for decision in 2018, and the petitioner's subsequent absence indicated compliance with that order, rendering the petition moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts