MAHARUDHRA TUKARAM BIDGAR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/5819/2008

Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030236962008

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

10th October 2008

Filing Number

WP/18753/2008

Filing Date

23-09-2008

Registration No

WP/5819/2008

Registration Date

07-10-2008

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

MAHARUDHRA TUKARAM BIDGAR AND ORS

Adv. MAHESH P. KALE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP,G P FOR R/ 1 TO 4,R/5 TO 7 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

13-02-2009

NOTIFICATION

24-04-2009

NOTIFICATION

15-12-2008

NOTIFICATION

14-11-2008

NOTIFICATION

03-06-2019

FOR ORDINARY MATTERS ON WARNED LIST ( S.J. )

Orders

10-10-2008

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARESH H. PATIL

24-04-2009

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B R GAVAI

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Maharudhra Tukaram Bidgar concerning a no-confidence motion against a village panchayat. The court found the petition infructuous due to the passage of time and dismissed it accordingly, with no representation appearing for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Maharudhra Tukaram Bidgar concerning a no-confidence motion against a village panchayat. The court found the petition infructuous due to the passage of time and dismissed it accordingly, with no representation appearing for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case