MAHARUDHRA TUKARAM BIDGAR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/5819/2008
Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030236962008
Filing Number
WP/18753/2008
Filing Date
23-Sep-2008
Registration No
WP/5819/2008
Registration Date
07-Oct-2008
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHARUDHRA TUKARAM BIDGAR AND ORS
Adv. MAHESH P. KALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP,G P FOR R/ 1 TO 4,R/5 TO 7 SERVED 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Maharudhra Tukaram Bidgar concerning a no-confidence motion against a village panchayat. The court found the petition infructuous due to the passage of time and dismissed it accordingly, with no representation appearing for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2019
For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta
-
24-Apr-2009
Hon'ble Shri Justice B R Gavai
-
24-Apr-2009
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice B R Gavai
-
13-Feb-2009
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil
-
15-Dec-2008
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.b.deshmukh
-
21-Nov-2008
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.b.deshmukh
-
14-Nov-2008
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.b.deshmukh
-
10-Oct-2008
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil
-
10-Oct-2008
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2008
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5819/2008
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Maharudhra Tukaram Bidgar concerning a no-confidence motion against a village panchayat. The court found the petition infructuous due to the passage of time and dismissed it accordingly, with no representation appearing for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts