MEHBOOB KHAN AZIZ KHAN vs G M MUGLIKAR AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHAH JAYANT RAMANLAL — CP/466/2017

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030235812017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

29th August 2017

Filing Number

CP/19495/2017

Filing Date

12-06-2017

Registration No

CP/466/2017

Registration Date

24-08-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

MEHBOOB KHAN AZIZ KHAN

Adv. Kazi S S

Respondent(s)

G M MUGLIKAR AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHAH JAYANT RAMANLAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

29-09-2017

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

30-03-2020

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

24-11-2017

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

29-08-2017

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

Orders

03-11-2017

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S V GANGAPURWALA,HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Contempt Petitions 465 and 466 of 2017 on the basis that the petitioner's counsel confirmed compliance with the contempt orders in both petitions. The court found no further action necessary and accordingly closed both proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Contempt Petitions 465 and 466 of 2017 on the basis that the petitioner's counsel confirmed compliance with the contempt orders in both petitions. The court found no further action necessary and accordingly closed both proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case