SHAIKH SANDU TAJ MOHAMMAD PATEL vs G M MUGLIKAR AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHAH JAYANT RAMANLAL — CP/465/2017
Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030235802017
Next Hearing
29th August 2017
Filing Number
CP/19494/2017
Filing Date
12-06-2017
Registration No
CP/465/2017
Registration Date
24-08-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAIKH SANDU TAJ MOHAMMAD PATEL
Adv. Kazi S S
Respondent(s)
G M MUGLIKAR AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHAH JAYANT RAMANLAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 03-11-2017 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 24-11-2017 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 29-08-2017 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
Orders
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S V GANGAPURWALA,HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of contempt petitions filed by Shaikh Sandu Taj Mohammad Patel against G M Muglikar and another after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the contempt order had been fully complied with. The court accordingly closed both petitions on 04.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of contempt petitions filed by Shaikh Sandu Taj Mohammad Patel against G M Muglikar and another after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the contempt order had been fully complied with. The court accordingly closed both petitions on 04.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts