NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PIU, JALGAON THROUGH ITS PROJECTS DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V PAWAR MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH vs Rajendra Keshav Dutte And Another — ARBA/81/2026
Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030234842025
e-Filing Number
06-02-2025
Filing Number
ARBA/17498/2025
Filing Date
16-06-2025
Registration No
ARBA/81/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PIU, JALGAON THROUGH ITS PROJECTS DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V PAWAR MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Keshav Dutte And Another
The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer At Bhusawal
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India challenging compensation awarded for lands acquired for NH-6 widening near Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's awards of ₹2,600 per sq. mtr., finding the deductions for distance (20%) and size (15%) reasonable and the compensation adequate, relying on precedent from a similar case decided on April 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple arbitration appeals filed by the National Highways Authority of India challenging compensation awarded for lands acquired for NH-6 widening near Jalgaon. The court upheld the arbitrator's awards of ₹2,600 per sq. mtr., finding the deductions for distance (20%) and size (15%) reasonable and the compensation adequate, relying on precedent from a similar case decided on April 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts