BARKU VITTHOBA KOLI DIED THR LRS GANESH BARKU TAYADE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/7486/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Next hearing 01-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM030233922025

Filing Number

WP/17429/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

WP/7486/2025

Registration Date

20-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BARKU VITTHOBA KOLI DIED THR LRS GANESH BARKU TAYADE AND OTHERS

    Adv. Tiwari Suraj P.

  2. 2.SHASHIKANT BARKU TAYADE KOLI

  3. 3.SHIVAJI BARKU TAYADE KOLI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. AGP for R. Nos. 1 and 2.,Kale Ajeet B. FOR R. NO. 5,Notice of R.No. 6 to 10 are served 1123

  2. 2.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LAGHU PATBANDHARE VIBHAG

  4. 4.THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TAPI PATBANDAHRE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL

  5. 5.DNYANESHWAR BARKU TAYADE KOLI

  6. 6.KAUSHALYABAI HIRAMAN KOLI

  7. 7.HIRABAI GOPAL BORSE

  8. 8.ALKABAI SURESH KOLI

  9. 9.APRUK BAPU KOLI

  10. 10.SARLABAI BANDRINATH KOLI

  11. 11.CHHAYA SANTOSH JADHAV

Case History

  1. 01-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Summary: Writ Petition No. 7486 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench has been rejected. The petitioners challenged an executing court's order refusing to stay proceedings in a land acquisition compensation case, claiming entitlement to share in the compensation. The court found the petitioners failed to provide material evidence supporting their claim and noted they had not filed any suit to assert their rights, upholding the lower court's decision. The petitioners remain free to establish their rights through appropriate legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  18. 26-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7486/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Writ Petition No. 7486 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench has been rejected. The petitioners challenged an executing court's order refusing to stay proceedings in a land acquisition compensation case, claiming entitlement to share in the compensation. The court found the petitioners failed to provide material evidence supporting their claim and noted they had not filed any suit to assert their rights, upholding the lower court's decision. The petitioners remain free to establish their rights through appropriate legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case