RAJENDRA PELAD RATHOD vs SUNITA HAUSABAI CHANDRASHEKHAR CHAVHAN ALIAS SUNITA TUKARAM BHALERAO AND OTHERS — WP/6144/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030233792026

Filing Number

WP/16991/2026

Filing Date

18-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/6144/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA PELAD RATHOD

    Adv. Gore Ravindra Vitthal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA HAUSABAI CHANDRASHEKHAR CHAVHAN ALIAS SUNITA TUKARAM BHALERAO AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE HEADMASTER ZILL PARISHAD PRIMAY SCHOOL

  4. 4.CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OFFICER

  5. 5.ANGANWADI HELPER

  6. 6.GRAMSEVAK GRAM PANCHYAT OFFICE

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Rajendra Pelad Rathod challenging the Divisional Commissioner's order dated 15.06.2026, which refused to entertain his application for a DNA test of respondent no.1. The Court found no interference warranted at the intermediate stage since the substantive appeal remains pending before the Additional Divisional Commissioner, who has now closed the matter for final orders. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the final order if needed. All contentions were kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Rajendra Pelad Rathod challenging the Divisional Commissioner's order dated 15.06.2026, which refused to entertain his application for a DNA test of respondent no.1. The Court found no interference warranted at the intermediate stage since the substantive appeal remains pending before the Additional Divisional Commissioner, who has now closed the matter for final orders. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the final order if needed. All contentions were kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case