KERU BHAGA DAWARE DIED THR LRS BALU KERU DAWARE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/7738/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030233382025

Filing Number

WP/17381/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

WP/7738/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KERU BHAGA DAWARE DIED THR LRS BALU KERU DAWARE AND OTHERS

    Adv. Shahaji K. Shinde

  2. 2.BALCHAND GANPAT TITME

  3. 3.BHAUSAHEB BALCHAND TITME

  4. 4.keru ramchadnra titme

  5. 5.dnyandeo deoram godse

  6. 6.RAGHUANTH MADHAV TITME DIED THR LR DINESH RAGHUNATH TITME

  7. 7.ANUSAYA BALCHANDRA DAWARE

  8. 8.KRUSHNABAI LAXMAN TITME

  9. 9.ASHOK KALU TITME

  10. 10.POPAT ANANDA KHOND

  11. 11.CHANDRABHAN SAKHARAM DAWARE

  12. 12.VIJAY RANGNATH WANDEKAR

  13. 13.RAMHARI BHAU TITME DIED THR LRS SHARAD RAMHARI TITME

  14. 14.PRADIP NIVRUTTI DAWRE

  15. 15.SANJAY BALCHAND WANDEKAR

  16. 16.YOGESH RAM DAWRE

  17. 17.DADAPATIL RAKHMA TITME

  18. 18.KONDIBA GANPAT DAWARE

  19. 19.TANAJI RAMBHAU DAWARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. A.G.P. FOR R.NOS. 1 TO 3 ARE WAIVES,R.NO. 4 IS SERVED,KULKARNI MUKUL S. FOR R. NO. 4 1123

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR

  3. 3.THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER NO

  4. 4.THE EXEUCTIVE ENGINEER UPPAR PRAVARA DAM DIVISION

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jul-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/7738/2025 On 6th May 2026, the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Keru Bhaga Daware and others against the State of Maharashtra and the Collector Ahmednagar. The court directed the respondents to file their reply by 29th July 2026, with a warning that if the reply is not filed by that date, the matter will proceed and be decided in the absence of the reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  9. 29-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  11. 10-Jul-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  12. 02-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7738/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/7738/2025 On 6th May 2026, the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Keru Bhaga Daware and others against the State of Maharashtra and the Collector Ahmednagar. The court directed the respondents to file their reply by 29th July 2026, with a warning that if the reply is not filed by that date, the matter will proceed and be decided in the absence of the reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case