VISHAL BHAGATSING PATIL vs C N SURYAWANSHI PRESIDENT DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE JALGAON AND OTHERS — CP/468/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Jul-2018

CNR: HCBM030232222018

Filing Number

CP/18219/2018

Filing Date

29-Jun-2018

Registration No

CP/468/2018

Registration Date

03-Jul-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Caste Claim - Vj
Contempt of Court Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL BHAGATSING PATIL

    Adv. BOLKAR YOGESH B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C N SURYAWANSHI PRESIDENT DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE JALGAON AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Vishal Bhagatsing Patil. The court found that the petitioner's tribe claim had been previously directed to be decided in 2017, and the petitioner's subsequent absence suggested compliance with that order. Accordingly, the contempt petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 05-Jul-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. DhavaleView PDF

  5. 05-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/468/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Vishal Bhagatsing Patil. The court found that the petitioner's tribe claim had been previously directed to be decided in 2017, and the petitioner's subsequent absence suggested compliance with that order. Accordingly, the contempt petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case