SANJAY DATTOBA NADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — WP/8575/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030231602018
Next Hearing
30th July 2018
Filing Number
WP/18162/2018
Filing Date
29-06-2018
Registration No
WP/8575/2018
Registration Date
26-07-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY DATTOBA NADE
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. GP FOR R/1 AND 2 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 30-07-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 29-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 15-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 18-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the compensation amount awarded had already been paid to the petitioner. Since the relief sought had been realized, the court found no further purpose in continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the compensation amount awarded had already been paid to the petitioner. Since the relief sought had been realized, the court found no further purpose in continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts