JAYRAM NATHUJI SALUNKE vs THE DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE ELECTION OFFICER AND OTHERS — WP/6029/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030226272026
Filing Number
WP/16455/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/6029/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYRAM NATHUJI SALUNKE
Adv. Gore Ravindra Vitthal
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE ELECTION OFFICER AND OTHERS
-
2.AURANGABAD DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
-
3.RAJU BANSIDHAR POL
-
4.SHESHRAO BHAURAO JADHAV
-
5.SANJAY VITTHALRAO JADHAV
-
6.INDUMATI SAHEBRAO PATIL
-
7.RUPCHAND LAXMAN GADEKAR
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/6029/2026 Outcome: Petition dismissed. Jayram Nathuji Salunke challenged the Election Officer's rejection of his objection to Raju Bansidhar Pol's nomination as delegate to the District Central Co-operative Bank election. Salunke argued Pol was ineligible under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Section 73 CA because Pol was a director of a defaulting member society. The court held that disqualification applies only to directors, not members, of defaulting societies, and since Pol had resigned from directorship before the qualifying date, he was merely a member at that time. The court dismissed the petition while keeping contentions open for post-election challenges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6029/2026
Case Summary: WP/6029/2026 Outcome: Petition dismissed. Jayram Nathuji Salunke challenged the Election Officer's rejection of his objection to Raju Bansidhar Pol's nomination as delegate to the District Central Co-operative Bank election. Salunke argued Pol was ineligible under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Section 73 CA because Pol was a director of a defaulting member society. The court held that disqualification applies only to directors, not members, of defaulting societies, and since Pol had resigned from directorship before the qualifying date, he was merely a member at that time. The court dismissed the petition while keeping contentions open for post-election challenges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts