VITTHAL DASHRATH GALPHADE vs SHIVAJI SUDAM VARPE AND OTHERS — WP/6024/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030226242026

Filing Number

WP/16453/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/6024/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VITTHAL DASHRATH GALPHADE

    Adv. JOSHI RHSHIKESH A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAJI SUDAM VARPE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.CHATRABHUJ MARUTI VARPE

  3. 3.SURESH SUDAM VARPE

  4. 4.BALASAHEB SUDAM VARPE

  5. 5.SHRIRANG MARUTI VARPE

  6. 6.RAJENDRA CHATRUBHUJ VARPE

  7. 7.TRIMBAK NAMDEO VARPE

  8. 8.DNYANESHWAR TUKARAM VARPE

  9. 9.MADHUKAR TUKARAM VARPE

  10. 10.BABASAHEB SOPAN RAYKAR

  11. 11.THE TAHASILDAR

  12. 12.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KALAMB

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6024/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a writ petition by Vitthal Dashrath Galphade challenging a Tahsildar's finding that private respondents had a customary right to use a portion of land (C-D) to access the Shegaon-Pandharpur highway. The court found prima facie that the respondents had no established customary way on that land portion merely because the petitioner used an adjacent portion (B-A) from his own land. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 15.07.2026 and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (B) pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6024/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6024/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a writ petition by Vitthal Dashrath Galphade challenging a Tahsildar's finding that private respondents had a customary right to use a portion of land (C-D) to access the Shegaon-Pandharpur highway. The court found prima facie that the respondents had no established customary way on that land portion merely because the petitioner used an adjacent portion (B-A) from his own land. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 15.07.2026 and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (B) pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case