AJIT KAUR PRITAM SINGH CHABDA vs RANJIT KAUR PRITHPAL SINGH GURUDATTA AND OTHERS — WP/6003/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030223732026

Filing Number

WP/16290/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/6003/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIT KAUR PRITAM SINGH CHABDA

    Adv. Natu Sharad V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT KAUR PRITHPAL SINGH GURUDATTA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.GURUDEEPSINGH PRITAM SINGH CHABDA

  3. 3.AMARDEEPSINGH PRITAMSINGH CHABDA

  4. 4.MANMEETKAUR DHANPALSINGH SALUJA

  5. 5.TAJANDARKAUR GURMITSINGH ANAND

  6. 6.DHARAMSINGH SARDARSINGH CHHABDA DECEASED HIS LRS DHANBEER KAUR DHARAMSINGH CHHABADA

  7. 7.HARVINDERKAUR JASBIRSINGH SULUJA THR. LRS SIMARPAL SINGH JASBIR SINGH SULUJA

  8. 8.SURJEETSINGH SARDARSINGH CHHABADA THR HIS LRS. MRS. JASBIRKAUR SURJEETSINGH CHHABDA

  9. 9.SURENDERSINGH SARDARSINGH CHHABADA

  10. 10.LAKHBEERSINGH SARDARSINGH CHHABADA

  11. 11.AMARJEETKAUR MAHENDERSINGH FURUDATTA

  12. 12.M/S PRATAP BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS THR IT PARTNER VIKRAM PREMCHAND SURANA

  13. 13.RAJA PREM GOPALSAINCHER THR. LRS. SANTOSH SAINCHER LATE RAJAPREM GOPAL SAINCHER

  14. 14.MOHAMMED SADDIK MOHAMMED YAKUB

  15. 15.KASLIWAL DEVELOPERS THR PRTNER SANJAY KASLIWAL

  16. 16.SAISHILP AKRUTI CONSTRUCTIONS PRATAP NAGAR

  17. 17.SUNIL MALPANI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPER SURAJ PARAK

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 6003/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's order directing production of the original power of attorney document dated 16.07.2008. The Court held that since secondary evidence of the power of attorney was already permitted by prior order, questions regarding document genuineness and acceptability should be resolved during final judgment, not at the evidence stage. All points remain open for consideration at final hearing of the underlying Special Civil Suit No. 207/2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 6003/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's order directing production of the original power of attorney document dated 16.07.2008. The Court held that since secondary evidence of the power of attorney was already permitted by prior order, questions regarding document genuineness and acceptability should be resolved during final judgment, not at the evidence stage. All points remain open for consideration at final hearing of the underlying Special Civil Suit No. 207/2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case