SUNIL SUKHDEO RATHOD AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/974/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030223632026

Filing Number

ABA/6067/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABA/974/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118,115,352,351,189,191,190

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL SUKHDEO RATHOD AND ANOTHER

    Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI

  2. 2.RAVIKUMAR SUKHDEO RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE POLICE INSPECTOR

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/974/2026 Anticipatory bail granted to applicants Sunil Sukhdeo Rathod and another in Crime No. 0244/2026 (Chikalthana Police Station). The court found prima facie evidence of false implication based on material showing the incident occurred at applicant No. 2's house (not the informant's as claimed), delay in FIR lodging, previous disputes between parties, and applicants' clean criminal record. Each applicant released on PR Bond of Rs. 15,000 with one solvent surety, subject to conditions including police cooperation, witness non-contact, and evidence non-interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/974/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/974/2026 Anticipatory bail granted to applicants Sunil Sukhdeo Rathod and another in Crime No. 0244/2026 (Chikalthana Police Station). The court found prima facie evidence of false implication based on material showing the incident occurred at applicant No. 2's house (not the informant's as claimed), delay in FIR lodging, previous disputes between parties, and applicants' clean criminal record. Each applicant released on PR Bond of Rs. 15,000 with one solvent surety, subject to conditions including police cooperation, witness non-contact, and evidence non-interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case