OSMANUDDIN AMINUDDIN KHAJA vs ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER Advocate - DESHPANDE SANJEEV B, ,BHARASWADKAR PATIL KALPALATA,SUDHIR PATIL FOR R NO. 1,COPY SERVED ON UOI,Talhar Ajay G.,LADDA DWARKADAS S FOR R.NO. 1,AMOL RAM JOSHI FOR R.NO. 1 — WP/4354/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jul-2020

CNR: HCBM030223482019

Filing Number

WP/17096/2019

Filing Date

10-Jun-2019

Registration No

WP/4354/2020

Registration Date

24-Jun-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OSMANUDDIN AMINUDDIN KHAJA

    Adv. YADKIKAR AMIT A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER Advocate - DESHPANDE SANJEEV B, ,BHARASWADKAR PATIL KALPALATA,SUDHIR PATIL FOR R NO. 1,COPY SERVED ON UOI,Talhar Ajay G.,LADDA DWARKADAS S FOR R.NO. 1,AMOL RAM JOSHI FOR R.NO. 1

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, finding that the petitioner had an alternate and efficacious remedy available under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The court granted permission for withdrawal with liberty to pursue the alternate remedy, and directed that time spent prosecuting this petition be considered in deciding any future application for condonation of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  4. 03-Jul-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Dec-2019

    —View PDF

  6. 10-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4354/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, finding that the petitioner had an alternate and efficacious remedy available under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The court granted permission for withdrawal with liberty to pursue the alternate remedy, and directed that time spent prosecuting this petition be considered in deciding any future application for condonation of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case