SANTOSH SOPAN MEHTRE vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AHILYANAGAR AND OTHERS — WP/5804/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030222512026

Filing Number

WP/16202/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/5804/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH SOPAN MEHTRE

    Adv. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AHILYANAGAR AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  3. 3.THE CHIEF OFFICER NAGAR PANCHAYT KARJAT

  4. 4.SATISH UDDAVRAO PATIL

  5. 5.JYOTI LALASAHEB SHELKE

  6. 6.LANKABAI DEVIDAS KHARAT

  7. 7.AMRUT SHRIDHAR KALDATE

  8. 8.SUVARNA RAVINDRA SUPEKAR

  9. 9.PRATIBHA NANDKISHOR BHAILUME

  10. 10.CHHAYA SUNIL SHERA

  11. 11.TARABAI SURESH KULTE

  12. 12.MONALI ONKAR TOTE

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 5804/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) admitted the writ petition by Santosh Sopan Mehtre against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court allowed deletion of respondent no.2, issued notice to remaining respondents returnable on 22.06.2026, and permitted the petitioner to serve respondents 3-12 through alternate modes with an affidavit of service filing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5804/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 5804/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) admitted the writ petition by Santosh Sopan Mehtre against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court allowed deletion of respondent no.2, issued notice to remaining respondents returnable on 22.06.2026, and permitted the petitioner to serve respondents 3-12 through alternate modes with an affidavit of service filing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case