BHARTI ASHOK GORE AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5874/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030219052026
Filing Number
WP/15931/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5874/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARTI ASHOK GORE AND ANOTHER
Adv. Udhan Vishal V
-
2.KAKASAHEB TULSHIDAS RAKHUNDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR
-
3.THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR
-
4.SMT TARABAI SANTRAM AVHAD
-
5.RAMDAS CHOWKAJI PATEKAR
-
6.SARUBAI VISHWANTH BHONDVE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by restoring interim relief that had been vacated by the Divisional Registrar on 08.06.2026. The court accepted the petitioners' undertaking to proceed with their pending Appeals (Nos. 32-35 of 2025) without further adjournment and continued the status quo protection till the next hearing on 30.06.2026, without examining the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5874/2026
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by restoring interim relief that had been vacated by the Divisional Registrar on 08.06.2026. The court accepted the petitioners' undertaking to proceed with their pending Appeals (Nos. 32-35 of 2025) without further adjournment and continued the status quo protection till the next hearing on 30.06.2026, without examining the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts