HASINA SHAIKH UMAR SHAIKH AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/959/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030217732026
Filing Number
ABA/5941/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABA/959/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HASINA SHAIKH UMAR SHAIKH AND OTHERS
Adv. Dongare Keval H.
-
2.SAYYED HUSENA SAYYED ABDUL
-
3.ANVAR BABAMIYA SHAIKH
-
4.SAYYED SADDAM ABDUL SAYYED
-
5.DILAVAR BABAMIYA SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/959/2026 The Aurangabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Hasina Shaikh Umar Shaikh, Sayyed Husena Sayyed Abdul, Anvar Babamiya Shaikh, and two others) in connection with Crime No. 0326/2026 registered at Bidkin Police Station. The applicants were accused of offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the offences were bailable in nature and applicants had no criminal history, warranting protection of liberty. Bail was granted on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety, subject to conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/959/2026
Case Summary: ABA/959/2026 The Aurangabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Hasina Shaikh Umar Shaikh, Sayyed Husena Sayyed Abdul, Anvar Babamiya Shaikh, and two others) in connection with Crime No. 0326/2026 registered at Bidkin Police Station. The applicants were accused of offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the offences were bailable in nature and applicants had no criminal history, warranting protection of liberty. Bail was granted on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety, subject to conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts