HASINA SHAIKH UMAR SHAIKH AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/959/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030217732026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

ABA/5941/2026

Filing Date

09-06-2026

Registration No

ABA/959/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,326,74,189,191,115,351,324

Petitioner(s)

HASINA SHAIKH UMAR SHAIKH AND OTHERS

Adv. Dongare Keval H.

SAYYED HUSENA SAYYED ABDUL

ANVAR BABAMIYA SHAIKH

SAYYED SADDAM ABDUL SAYYED

DILAVAR BABAMIYA SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Case Summary: ABA/959/2026 The Aurangabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Hasina Shaikh Umar Shaikh, Sayyed Husena Sayyed Abdul, Anvar Babamiya Shaikh, and two others) in connection with Crime No. 0326/2026 registered at Bidkin Police Station. The applicants were accused of offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the offences were bailable in nature and applicants had no criminal history, warranting protection of liberty. Bail was granted on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety, subject to conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/959/2026 The Aurangabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Hasina Shaikh Umar Shaikh, Sayyed Husena Sayyed Abdul, Anvar Babamiya Shaikh, and two others) in connection with Crime No. 0326/2026 registered at Bidkin Police Station. The applicants were accused of offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the offences were bailable in nature and applicants had no criminal history, warranting protection of liberty. Bail was granted on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety, subject to conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case