SAIBABA PARAMESH NAMEWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/956/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030217662026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

ABA/5937/2026

Filing Date

09-06-2026

Registration No

ABA/956/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,64,69,87,3(5)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCE ACT, 2012 Section 4,8,12

Petitioner(s)

SAIBABA PARAMESH NAMEWAR

Adv. JANAKWADE SHIVSAMB N.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

XYZ

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

12-06-2026

ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Case Summary: ABA/956/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Saibaba Paramesh Namewar in a POCSO Act case. The applicant, accused of providing accommodation in an alleged child sexual abuse matter, was released on a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety. The court found that abetment charges may not apply and noted the applicant's clean criminal record. The case was adjourned to 09.07.2026 with conditions including police cooperation, witness non-contact, and evidence preservation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/956/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Saibaba Paramesh Namewar in a POCSO Act case. The applicant, accused of providing accommodation in an alleged child sexual abuse matter, was released on a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety. The court found that abetment charges may not apply and noted the applicant's clean criminal record. The case was adjourned to 09.07.2026 with conditions including police cooperation, witness non-contact, and evidence preservation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case