KRUSHNA TUKARAM SHELKE AND ANOTHER vs DNYANOBA KRUSHNA SHELKE AND OTHERS — WP/6940/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030216892025
Filing Number
WP/16279/2025
Filing Date
03-06-2025
Registration No
WP/6940/2025
Registration Date
05-06-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRUSHNA TUKARAM SHELKE AND ANOTHER
Adv. Rahul Pandhari Cheble
PURUSHOTTAM TUKARAM SHELKE
Respondent(s)
DNYANOBA KRUSHNA SHELKE AND OTHERS
Adv. R.NO 1 TO 3 SERVED,GUNDRE SURAJ V FOR R. NO. 1 TO 3 1123
GAYABAI DNYANOBA SHELKE
UDDHAV DNYANOBA SHELKE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | |
| 17-03-2026 | |
| 10-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 16-02-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 08-01-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's order appointing a Court Commissioner at the nascent stage of the suit, holding that such appointment was premature when issues remained unframed. The court permitted the plaintiff to re-file the application for Court Commissioner appointment only after evidence is recorded, when the court determines expert assistance is necessary for reaching conclusions in the ownership and injunction case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's order appointing a Court Commissioner at the nascent stage of the suit, holding that such appointment was premature when issues remained unframed. The court permitted the plaintiff to re-file the application for Court Commissioner appointment only after evidence is recorded, when the court determines expert assistance is necessary for reaching conclusions in the ownership and injunction case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts