AARTI ALIAS NALINI SUKHDEV SALVE vs THE PRINCIPAL GOOD SHEPHERD ACADEMY AND OTHERS — CA/5930/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030216452026

Filing Number

CA/15728/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CA/5930/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AARTI ALIAS NALINI SUKHDEV SALVE

    Adv. CHAUDHARI CHETAN BARKU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE PRINCIPAL GOOD SHEPHERD ACADEMY AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Case Summary: CA 5930/2026 In this interlocutory application filed in Civil Application No. 5930 of 2026 (arising from Writ Petition No. 10901 of 2025) by Aarti Alias Nalini Sukhdev Salve against The Principal, Good Shepherd Academy and others, the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, issued notice to the respondents with the returnable date extended by three weeks. The court permitted the petitioner to serve respondents privately in addition to court process, as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5930/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA 5930/2026 In this interlocutory application filed in Civil Application No. 5930 of 2026 (arising from Writ Petition No. 10901 of 2025) by Aarti Alias Nalini Sukhdev Salve against The Principal, Good Shepherd Academy and others, the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, issued notice to the respondents with the returnable date extended by three weeks. The court permitted the petitioner to serve respondents privately in addition to court process, as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case