SUKHDEV BHAGU RATHOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/952/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030214592026
Filing Number
ABA/5890/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABA/952/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHDEV BHAGU RATHOD
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/952/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted anticipatory bail to Sukhdev Bhagu Rathod on 11 June 2026. The applicant faced assault charges in Crime No. 0244/2026, but the court found the allegations vague with no specific charges against him, and noted a land dispute context suggesting possibility of false implication. The applicant was granted bail on a PR Bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety, subject to conditions including attending police station when called, not contacting witnesses, and cooperating with investigation. The case was adjourned to 10 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Anticipatory Bail - First Time
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/952/2026
Case Summary: ABA/952/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted anticipatory bail to Sukhdev Bhagu Rathod on 11 June 2026. The applicant faced assault charges in Crime No. 0244/2026, but the court found the allegations vague with no specific charges against him, and noted a land dispute context suggesting possibility of false implication. The applicant was granted bail on a PR Bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety, subject to conditions including attending police station when called, not contacting witnesses, and cooperating with investigation. The case was adjourned to 10 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts