KAVITA BABASAHEB ALIAS TUKARAM JOGDAND vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/950/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030214392026
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
ABA/5885/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
ABA/950/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAVITA BABASAHEB ALIAS TUKARAM JOGDAND
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME |
Orders
Case Summary: ABA/950/2026 Anticipatory bail was granted to Kavita Babasaheb Alias Tukaram Jogdand by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court on June 11, 2026, for offences under IPC Sections 107, 120-B, 197, 198, 177, 415, 420, 403, 405, 406, 409, and 34 registered at Parali City Police Station. She was granted bail on furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety, conditional upon depositing Rs. 1,25,000 within two weeks and compliance with conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and non-interference with evidence. The order would stand vacated if the amount was not deposited within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA/950/2026 Anticipatory bail was granted to Kavita Babasaheb Alias Tukaram Jogdand by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court on June 11, 2026, for offences under IPC Sections 107, 120-B, 197, 198, 177, 415, 420, 403, 405, 406, 409, and 34 registered at Parali City Police Station. She was granted bail on furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety, conditional upon depositing Rs. 1,25,000 within two weeks and compliance with conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and non-interference with evidence. The order would stand vacated if the amount was not deposited within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts