KAVITA BABASAHEB ALIAS TUKARAM JOGDAND vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/950/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030214392026
Filing Number
ABA/5885/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABA/950/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAVITA BABASAHEB ALIAS TUKARAM JOGDAND
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/950/2026 Anticipatory bail was granted to Kavita Babasaheb Alias Tukaram Jogdand by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court on June 11, 2026, for offences under IPC Sections 107, 120-B, 197, 198, 177, 415, 420, 403, 405, 406, 409, and 34 registered at Parali City Police Station. She was granted bail on furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety, conditional upon depositing Rs. 1,25,000 within two weeks and compliance with conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and non-interference with evidence. The order would stand vacated if the amount was not deposited within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Anticipatory Bail - First Time
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/950/2026
Case Summary: ABA/950/2026 Anticipatory bail was granted to Kavita Babasaheb Alias Tukaram Jogdand by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court on June 11, 2026, for offences under IPC Sections 107, 120-B, 197, 198, 177, 415, 420, 403, 405, 406, 409, and 34 registered at Parali City Police Station. She was granted bail on furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety, conditional upon depositing Rs. 1,25,000 within two weeks and compliance with conditions including police station attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and non-interference with evidence. The order would stand vacated if the amount was not deposited within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts