SUSHILA DARSHAN JAGTAP vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/949/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030214332026
Filing Number
ABA/5884/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABA/949/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUSHILA DARSHAN JAGTAP
Adv. OSTWAL ABHAYKUMAR DILIP,KARTAVYA S. OSTWAL,KARTAVYA S. OSTWAL, KARTAVYA S. OSTWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/949/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Sushila Darshan Jagtap in connection with C.R. No. 540/2025 (Tophkhana Police Station) for offences under BNS Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 3(5). She must furnish a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one surety, attend police station as required, refrain from contacting witnesses or interfering with evidence, and cooperate with investigations. The applicant voluntarily agreed to deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within three weeks, failure of which would vacate the order. The matter is returnable on 10.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Anticipatory Bail - First Time
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/949/2026
Case Summary: ABA/949/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Sushila Darshan Jagtap in connection with C.R. No. 540/2025 (Tophkhana Police Station) for offences under BNS Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 3(5). She must furnish a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one surety, attend police station as required, refrain from contacting witnesses or interfering with evidence, and cooperate with investigations. The applicant voluntarily agreed to deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within three weeks, failure of which would vacate the order. The matter is returnable on 10.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts