BAPPASAHEB LIMBRAJ BAWALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/6187/2016

Case under Constitution of India. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030214152016

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

WP/17269/2016

Filing Date

07-06-2016

Registration No

WP/6187/2016

Registration Date

14-06-2016

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Mah.civil Services(ser.con) Rule 1981

Petitioner(s)

BAPPASAHEB LIMBRAJ BAWALE

Adv. Adwant S.V.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. GP FOR R.1 & 2,R/3 SERVED.,Mote Umesh S.,NAVANDAR MANISH N. FOR R/3 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

07-01-2019

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

18-04-2019

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

05-02-2020

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

18-12-2018

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

15-06-2016

PRODUCTION [ FRESH ]

Orders

22-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Case Summary: In WP 6187/2016, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the hearing of Dr. Bappasaheb Limbraj Bawale's writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner's advocate requested adjournment citing personal difficulty, which the court granted despite opposition from the respondent's counsel. The case was stood over to 28.04.2026 for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 6187/2016, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the hearing of Dr. Bappasaheb Limbraj Bawale's writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner's advocate requested adjournment citing personal difficulty, which the court granted despite opposition from the respondent's counsel. The case was stood over to 28.04.2026 for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case