DHANAJI RAJARAM ATOLKAR ALLEGEDLY AS MADHU TAILOR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APEAL/451/2026

Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14-A(2), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2), 3(v). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030212312026

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

05-06-2026

Filing Number

APEAL/5817/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

APEAL/451/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14-A(2), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2), 3(v)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1), 118(2), 115(1), 352
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

DHANAJI RAJARAM ATOLKAR ALLEGEDLY AS MADHU TAILOR

Adv. KALE NETAJI GANPATRAO

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

MALUDEO PRAKASH KAMBLE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

11-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 451/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim bail to appellant Dhanaji Rajaram Atolkar on June 11, 2026. The court found that prima facie allegations of caste abuse and weapon assault were directed at accused No. 1, not the appellant, and therefore the SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 18 bar did not apply. Bail was granted on furnishing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including police station attendance on June 18, 2026, non-tampering with evidence, and prohibition from leaving India pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 451/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim bail to appellant Dhanaji Rajaram Atolkar on June 11, 2026. The court found that prima facie allegations of caste abuse and weapon assault were directed at accused No. 1, not the appellant, and therefore the SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 18 bar did not apply. Bail was granted on furnishing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including police station attendance on June 18, 2026, non-tampering with evidence, and prohibition from leaving India pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case