KEDAR KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SAINATH D MEDEWAR GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — WP/5859/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030212172026
Filing Number
WP/15388/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5859/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KEDAR KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SAINATH D MEDEWAR GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL
-
2.SAINATH DATTATRAY MEDEWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE DISTRICT FERTILISER LICENSING AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT SUPERINTENDING AGRICULTURE OFFICER
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/5859/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to multiple agricultural service centers whose fertilizer licenses were suspended twice for the same infraction. The petitioners' licenses were suspended on 19.12.2025 based on deficiencies found during a 11.12.2025 inspection, then suspended again on 26.05.2026 using the identical inspection report. The Court found prima facie merit that subjecting them to duplicate action for one default was illegal and warranted writ jurisdiction interference. Notice was issued returnable on 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5859/2026
Case Summary: WP/5859/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to multiple agricultural service centers whose fertilizer licenses were suspended twice for the same infraction. The petitioners' licenses were suspended on 19.12.2025 based on deficiencies found during a 11.12.2025 inspection, then suspended again on 26.05.2026 using the identical inspection report. The Court found prima facie merit that subjecting them to duplicate action for one default was illegal and warranted writ jurisdiction interference. Notice was issued returnable on 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts