HANUMAN KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PRAKASH M BHARKAD GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — WP/5870/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030212152026
Filing Number
WP/15386/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5870/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HANUMAN KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PRAKASH M BHARKAD GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL
-
2.PRAKASH MANIKRAO BHARKAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE DISTRICT FERTILISER LICENSING AUTHORITY AND DISTRCT SUPERINTENDING AGRICULTURE OFFICER
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP 5870/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to Hanuman Krushi Seva Kendra and other fertilizer dealers whose licenses were suspended twice based on identical inspection deficiencies. The court found prima facie substance in petitioners' claim that actions dated 19.12.2025 and 26.05.2026 constituted double punishment for the same infraction, warranting writ jurisdiction intervention. Notice returnable 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5870/2026
Case Summary: WP 5870/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to Hanuman Krushi Seva Kendra and other fertilizer dealers whose licenses were suspended twice based on identical inspection deficiencies. The court found prima facie substance in petitioners' claim that actions dated 19.12.2025 and 26.05.2026 constituted double punishment for the same infraction, warranting writ jurisdiction intervention. Notice returnable 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts