VASANT AGRO SERVICE CENTRE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR VISANT U MEDEWAR GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — WP/5920/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030212142026
Filing Number
WP/15385/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5920/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VASANT AGRO SERVICE CENTRE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR VISANT U MEDEWAR GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL
-
2.VASANT UDAVRAO MEDEWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE DISTRICT FERTILISER LICENSING AUTHORITY AND DISTRCT SUPERINTENDIG AGRICULTURE OFFICER
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP 5920/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to Vasant Agro Service Centre on 15 June 2026. The petitioner challenged two successive suspension orders of its fertilizer license based on identical inspection report deficiencies from December 2025—first suspended 19.12.2025-03.01.2026, then again 26.05.2026-25.11.2026. The Court found prima facie that subjecting the petitioner to duplicate punitive action for the same infraction was illegal and warranted judicial intervention. Notice returnable 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5920/2026
Case Summary: WP 5920/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to Vasant Agro Service Centre on 15 June 2026. The petitioner challenged two successive suspension orders of its fertilizer license based on identical inspection report deficiencies from December 2025—first suspended 19.12.2025-03.01.2026, then again 26.05.2026-25.11.2026. The Court found prima facie that subjecting the petitioner to duplicate punitive action for the same infraction was illegal and warranted judicial intervention. Notice returnable 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts