MUNDE CONTRACTORS THROUGH ITS PARTNER RAMESH NARAYANRAO DHAKNE J.N. SINGH AND SUNIL L. SANGE vs ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS — WP/5638/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,39,41 AND 226. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030210272026
Filing Number
WP/15272/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5638/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNDE CONTRACTORS THROUGH ITS PARTNER RAMESH NARAYANRAO DHAKNE J.N. SINGH AND SUNIL L. SANGE
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
-
2.THE SECRETARY ROADS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
-
3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS REGION CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR
-
4.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS CIRCLE
-
5.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION NO. 2
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a writ petition filed by Munde Contractors challenging their disqualification from an e-tender process by the Public Works Department. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026, with the State waiving service requirements. The matter stands adjourned pending response from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
First On Board [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5638/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a writ petition filed by Munde Contractors challenging their disqualification from an e-tender process by the Public Works Department. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026, with the State waiving service requirements. The matter stands adjourned pending response from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts