FEROZ SIDDIQUI FARAZ SIDDIQUI AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/2136/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030209842026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/5710/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

APPLN/2136/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498-A,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FEROZ SIDDIQUI FARAZ SIDDIQUI AND OTHERS

    Adv. SHAIKH WASIF

  2. 2.Taherabi Faraz Siddiqui

  3. 3.Rukhsanabi Shaikh Fayyaz

  4. 4.Afrinbi Farooq Siddiqui

  5. 5.Farooq Siddiqui Faraz Siddiqui

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.Uzma Parveen Feroz Siddiqui

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: In Criminal Application No. 2136 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the court heard arguments from the applicants' counsel and the APP. The court issued notice to the respondents, returnable on 17.07.2026. The case was adjourned for further hearing; no substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/2136/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Criminal Application No. 2136 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the court heard arguments from the applicants' counsel and the APP. The court issued notice to the respondents, returnable on 17.07.2026. The case was adjourned for further hearing; no substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case