RAJESH ROHIDAS TEKALE vs MANISHA RAJESH TEKALE AND OTHERS — WP/768/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030209742026

e-Filing Number

16-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/5701/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/768/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Protection of Women from Domestic Voilence Act 2005 Section 23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH ROHIDAS TEKALE

    Adv. Sushant Baburao Choudhari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHA RAJESH TEKALE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Vedant Rajesh Tekale

  3. 3.Sai Rajesh Tekale

  4. 4.Radhabai Rohidas Tekale

  5. 5.Rohidas Ranjanrao Tekale

  6. 6.Tatyaram Parmeshwar Sondage

  7. 7.Shushama Tatyaram Sondage

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/768/2026 Outcome: The High Court granted an interim stay of the Appellate Court's order on maintenance pending further hearing. The Court issued notice to respondents Manisha Rajesh Tekale and one other respondent, returnable on 3rd July 2026. The petitioner argued the Appellate Court failed to consider the five-year delay in pursuing the 2019 maintenance application and the trial court's correct direction to pay maintenance from the order date rather than the application date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/768/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/768/2026 Outcome: The High Court granted an interim stay of the Appellate Court's order on maintenance pending further hearing. The Court issued notice to respondents Manisha Rajesh Tekale and one other respondent, returnable on 3rd July 2026. The petitioner argued the Appellate Court failed to consider the five-year delay in pursuing the 2019 maintenance application and the trial court's correct direction to pay maintenance from the order date rather than the application date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case