SUSHIL BALIRAM DONGARDIVE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/2054/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030208952026

Filing Number

APPLN/5636/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

APPLN/2054/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL BALIRAM DONGARDIVE

    Adv. KAMBLE SHIRISH M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SHUBHAM MANIK KHILLARE

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: APPLN/2054/2026 Outcome: Bail application allowed. Shubham Manikrao Khillare granted regular bail on furnishing Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties, subject to stringent conditions including non-entry into Jintur Taluka (except court dates), court attendance, and no witness intimidation. Reasoning: Court found applicant's name absent from informant's initial FIR narrative detailing a political rivalry assault. Prima facie absence of evidence establishing common intention or prior meeting of minds with co-accused. With no criminal antecedents and investigation nearly complete, further incarceration deemed unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/2054/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPLN/2054/2026 Outcome: Bail application allowed. Shubham Manikrao Khillare granted regular bail on furnishing Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties, subject to stringent conditions including non-entry into Jintur Taluka (except court dates), court attendance, and no witness intimidation. Reasoning: Court found applicant's name absent from informant's initial FIR narrative detailing a political rivalry assault. Prima facie absence of evidence establishing common intention or prior meeting of minds with co-accused. With no criminal antecedents and investigation nearly complete, further incarceration deemed unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case