MAHTER BHANGI SAMAJ DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION JINTUR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SHAIKH G S SHAFEE vs THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/5631/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030208702026
Filing Number
WP/15233/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5631/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHTER BHANGI SAMAJ DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION JINTUR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SHAIKH G S SHAFEE
Adv. Yogesh V. Jaybhaye
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER DIVISIONAL OFFICE MSRTC
-
3.THE DEPOT MANAGER MSRTC OFFICE AT BILOLI
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
Case Summary: WP 5631/2026 The Mahter Bhangi Samaj Development Foundation challenged MSRTC's contract termination order dated 29.05.2026 for alleged service deficiencies. The High Court at Aurangabad (Vacation Bench) adjourned the case, issuing notice to respondents returnable on 19.07.2026 and directing MSRTC to file an affidavit-in-reply, while noting maintainability objections and that similar petitions were previously dismissed with liberty to pursue civil remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5631/2026
Case Summary: WP 5631/2026 The Mahter Bhangi Samaj Development Foundation challenged MSRTC's contract termination order dated 29.05.2026 for alleged service deficiencies. The High Court at Aurangabad (Vacation Bench) adjourned the case, issuing notice to respondents returnable on 19.07.2026 and directing MSRTC to file an affidavit-in-reply, while noting maintainability objections and that similar petitions were previously dismissed with liberty to pursue civil remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts