KISHOR RANGNATH WALUNJE AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5571/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 19, 226, 227. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Next hearing 05-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030208642026

Filing Number

WP/15229/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/5571/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14, 19, 226, 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHOR RANGNATH WALUNJE AND ANOTHER

    Adv. MORE ABHIJIT S.

  2. 2.GAYASKHAN SHERKHAN PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE TAHASILDAR

  4. 4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER

  5. 5.BAPU SHANTARAM GAWALI

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5571/2026 The writ petition filed by Kishor Rangnath Walunje and another against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned by the Aurangabad High Court bench on June 5, 2026. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on July 3, 2026, with service waived for respondent nos. 1-4 and private service permitted for respondent no. 5. Petitioners must deposit the deficit court fee within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5571/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5571/2026 The writ petition filed by Kishor Rangnath Walunje and another against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned by the Aurangabad High Court bench on June 5, 2026. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on July 3, 2026, with service waived for respondent nos. 1-4 and private service permitted for respondent no. 5. Petitioners must deposit the deficit court fee within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case