MEHTER SAMAJ SAMAJIK SHAIKSHANIK SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KAMAL R KADOSE vs THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/5635/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Next hearing 05-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030208552026

Filing Number

WP/15225/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/5635/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEHTER SAMAJ SAMAJIK SHAIKSHANIK SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KAMAL R KADOSE

    Adv. Yogesh V. Jaybhaye

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC

  3. 3.THE DEPOT MANAGER MSRTC

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary - WP 5635/2026 The Mehter Samaj Samajik Shaikshanik Sanstha challenged MSRTC's contract termination order dated 29.05.2026. The court adjourned the petition, issuing notice to respondents returnable on 19.07.2026, and directed MSRTC to file an affidavit-in-reply. The respondent contested maintainability, citing a similar dismissed petition and Supreme Court precedent directing parties to civil court or arbitration for contract disputes involving factual questions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5635/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - WP 5635/2026 The Mehter Samaj Samajik Shaikshanik Sanstha challenged MSRTC's contract termination order dated 29.05.2026. The court adjourned the petition, issuing notice to respondents returnable on 19.07.2026, and directed MSRTC to file an affidavit-in-reply. The respondent contested maintainability, citing a similar dismissed petition and Supreme Court precedent directing parties to civil court or arbitration for contract disputes involving factual questions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case