JANJHIT SEVA SANSTHA KOPARGAON THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SHAMBHU M PATHAK vs THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/5634/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030208492026
Filing Number
WP/15223/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5634/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JANJHIT SEVA SANSTHA KOPARGAON THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SHAMBHU M PATHAK
Adv. Yogesh V. Jaybhaye
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
Case Summary: WP 5634/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. Notice issued to respondents returnable on 19.07.2026. MSRTC directed to file affidavit-in-reply with advance copy to petitioner. Details: Janjhit Seva Sanstha challenged MSRTC's contract termination order dated 08.05.2026 for alleged service deficiencies. The court noted a similar petition was dismissed by a Division Bench, which held writ jurisdiction inappropriate due to disputed factual questions and available alternative remedies (civil suit/arbitration). Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in that case. The Vacation Court proceeded with issuing notice for full hearing rather than dismissing at threshold. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5634/2026
Case Summary: WP 5634/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. Notice issued to respondents returnable on 19.07.2026. MSRTC directed to file affidavit-in-reply with advance copy to petitioner. Details: Janjhit Seva Sanstha challenged MSRTC's contract termination order dated 08.05.2026 for alleged service deficiencies. The court noted a similar petition was dismissed by a Division Bench, which held writ jurisdiction inappropriate due to disputed factual questions and available alternative remedies (civil suit/arbitration). Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in that case. The Vacation Court proceeded with issuing notice for full hearing rather than dismissing at threshold. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts