RAJU RADHAKISAN GAIKWAD AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — HCBM30208332026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030208332026

Filing Number

WP/15214/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU RADHAKISAN GAIKWAD AND OTHERS

    Adv. VIJAY ANIKRAO DHAKNE

  2. 2.VIJAYKUMAR DAGU DALE

  3. 3.ASHOK SADASHIV VIGHNE

  4. 4.GANESH ARJUNRAO KALE

  5. 5.HEMRAJ LAXMAN DESHBHRATAR

  6. 6.MAHENDRA SAMBHAJIRAO DESHMUKH

  7. 7.BHAGWAN KARBHARI DARWANTE

  8. 8.NANDU UTTAM JADHAV

  9. 9.NITIN DATTAPPA GABALE

  10. 10.KHANDERAO VITTHALRAO SONAWANE

  11. 11.SADASHIV GAJANAN KAMBLE

  12. 12.SUBHASH SHAMRAO KAPURE

  13. 13.VANDANA NAMDEO SALVE

  14. 14.ABDUL AJIJ NAWAB SHAH

  15. 15.NARENDRA VIJAYKUMAR DESHMUKH

  16. 16.MACHINDRA KARBHARI BADOGE

  17. 17.KAILASH NAGO LADKE

  18. 18.RAJENDRA KISAN PURI

  19. 19.ABAJI DADAJI SONWANE

  20. 20.BHAGCHAND SWARUPCHAND BRAHMANATH

  21. 21.JANARDHAN KARBHARI RAUT

  22. 22.SMITA SUNIL KHADKE

  23. 23.SAINATH NARAYAN FALKE

  24. 24.SUBODH KISANRAO WAGH

  25. 25.KADU NARAYAN JADHAV

  26. 26.YOGESH GANPAT AHER

  27. 27.RAMNATH RAJARAM RAVATE

  28. 28.ASHOK DASHRATH DARWANTE

  29. 29.GANESH DADARAO GAVHANE

  30. 30.KALYAN GULABRAO PAWAR

  31. 31.BHANUDAS KASHINATH MALPURE

  32. 32.DEVANAND NAMDEV SURADKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.ZILLA PARISHAD, CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR

  4. 4.THE EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary: Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: Case adjourned; interim relief granted. The High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 01.07.2026 and imposed a stay on the promotion process until the next hearing date. Key Issue: The petitioners, assistant teachers appointed between 1992-2003, challenged their exclusion from temporary seniority lists for promotion to positions of Headmasters, Cluster Heads, Graduate Teachers, and Extension Officers, despite having cleared TET/CTET examinations. The core dispute concerns whether the crucial date for TET/CTET qualification should be 14.05.2026 (when promotion process was initiated) or 01.09.2025 (first day of the select list year), per Government Resolution dated 01-08-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: Case adjourned; interim relief granted. The High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 01.07.2026 and imposed a stay on the promotion process until the next hearing date. Key Issue: The petitioners, assistant teachers appointed between 1992-2003, challenged their exclusion from temporary seniority lists for promotion to positions of Headmasters, Cluster Heads, Graduate Teachers, and Extension Officers, despite having cleared TET/CTET examinations. The core dispute concerns whether the crucial date for TET/CTET qualification should be 14.05.2026 (when promotion process was initiated) or 01.09.2025 (first day of the select list year), per Government Resolution dated 01-08-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case