YASHWANT EKNATH VYAWAHARE vs TANVI YASHWANT VYAWAHARE AND OTHERS — CA/9586/2017
Case under Indian Evidence Act 1872. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030207452017
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
CA/17291/2017
Filing Date
06-05-2017
Registration No
CA/9586/2017
Registration Date
19-07-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YASHWANT EKNATH VYAWAHARE
Adv. Garud N.C.
Respondent(s)
TANVI YASHWANT VYAWAHARE AND OTHERS
Adv. TEMAK RAHUL B. FOR R/3 (LEGAL GUARDIAN OF R/1 &
,R/3A TO 3C SERVED,ADV. TEMAK RAHUL BHAUSAHEB V. P FILED FOR R/3A TO R/3C 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
DUE ORDERS -CIVIL
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
DUE ORDERS- CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-08-2017 | DUE ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 28-07-2017 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 24-09-2020 | DUE ORDERS- CIVIL |
| 06-07-2026 | |
| 04-05-2026 |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: CA 9586/2017 SKIP The document provided is a court cause list/calendar dated 04.05.2026 from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench). While Civil Application No. 9586 of 2017 (the case in question) appears in the list at item 122, the document contains only administrative scheduling information—no substantive court order, judgment, or case outcome is provided. The only operative order states that "due to paucity of time, the matters could not reach" and that "interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date" (S.O. 06.07.2026). This is merely a procedural adjournment notice, not a final or substantive resolution of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: CA 9586/2017 SKIP The document provided is a court cause list/calendar dated 04.05.2026 from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench). While Civil Application No. 9586 of 2017 (the case in question) appears in the list at item 122, the document contains only administrative scheduling information—no substantive court order, judgment, or case outcome is provided. The only operative order states that "due to paucity of time, the matters could not reach" and that "interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date" (S.O. 06.07.2026). This is merely a procedural adjournment notice, not a final or substantive resolution of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts