ANIL RANGNATHRAO PURI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/5614/2016
Case under Act Not Known. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030206242016
Next Hearing
08th June 2016
Filing Number
WP/16790/2016
Filing Date
12-05-2016
Registration No
WP/5614/2016
Registration Date
24-05-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL RANGNATHRAO PURI
Adv. Dighe Praveen S
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. GP FOR R/ 1 TO 5,BHAVAR N.R. FOR R/ 7,R/ 6,8,9 SERVED,BHAVAR NITIN R.,SHINDE MAHESH P 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-07-2016 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 08-06-2016 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 12-03-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 04-05-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 27-04-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 5614/2016 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Anil Rangnathrao Puri's writ petition, quashing the District Deputy Registrar's order directing an enquiry under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner, serving as Assistant Registrar and Liquidator of a co-operative bank, had paid professional fees to panel advocates for legal proceedings. The court found no case for enquiry, holding that payment of fees to panel advocates on case-by-case basis constituted legitimate professional expenses within the Liquidator's statutory powers, with no evidence of misappropriation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 5614/2016 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Anil Rangnathrao Puri's writ petition, quashing the District Deputy Registrar's order directing an enquiry under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner, serving as Assistant Registrar and Liquidator of a co-operative bank, had paid professional fees to panel advocates for legal proceedings. The court found no case for enquiry, holding that payment of fees to panel advocates on case-by-case basis constituted legitimate professional expenses within the Liquidator's statutory powers, with no evidence of misappropriation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts